Search Results
You searched for "Peace" and here's what we found ...
Eight years ago, President Obama had a chance to change the warmongering direction that outgoing President Bush and the U.S. national-security establishment had led America for the previous eight years. Obama could have said, “Enough is enough. America has done enough killing and dying. I’m going to lead our country in a different direction — toward peace, prosperity, and harmony with the people of the world.” He could have ordered all U.S. troops in the Middle East and Afghanistan to return home. He could have ended U.S. involvement in the endless wars that Bush, the Pentagon, and the CIA spawned in that part of the world. He could have led America in a new direction.
Instead, Obama decided to stay Bush’s course, no doubt believing that he, unlike Bush, could win the endless wars that Bush had started. It was not to be. He chose to keep the national-security establishment embroiled in Afghanistan and Iraq. Death and destruction are Obama’s ...
For the last year, the American people have had their fun, what with all those presidential candidates catering to them, being nice to them, offering them goodies, and saying all sorts of nice things about them.
Tomorrow, however, the roles reverse once again. Either Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump will be in charge. One of them will assume his or her role as America’s newest democratically elected dictator.
The people will reassume their roles as serfs.
That term — democratically elected dictator — undoubtedly shocks lots of Americans. That’s because they have been inculcated with the belief that democracy is freedom. When people are free to elect their president, the notion goes, that shows that they are free.
But nothing could be further from the truth. Freedom is determined by the nature of the power that the government wields over the citizenry, not by the manner in which a ruler becomes a ruler.
For example, let’s assume that a foreign ruler wields omnipotent power ...