Search Query: history of cia wars
Search Results
You searched for "history of cia wars" and here's what we found ...
Saturday, February 28, 2004
British Prime Minister Tony Blair is angry and outraged over the public disclosure by his former cabinet member, Clare Short, that British officials secretly and surreptitiously spied on UN Secretary General Kofi Annan. (As President Bush put it early on, in the war on terrorism, you’re either with us or against us, and since Annan did not support the invasion and war of aggression against Iraq, that presumably put him on the side of the terrorists and therefore made him the proper target of a secret and surreptitious spy operation.)
Did Blair deny the charge? No, he’s just angry and outraged over the lack of patriotism shown by someone who would have the audacity to reveal such nefarious Top Secret misconduct. “National security,” you know.
I wonder if Blair would have sided with U.S. President ...
Saturday, February 28, 2004
British Prime Minister Tony Blair is angry and outraged over the public disclosure by his former cabinet member, Clare Short, that British officials secretly and surreptitiously spied on UN Secretary General Kofi Annan. (As President Bush put it early on, in the war on terrorism, you’re either with us or against us, and since Annan did not support the invasion and war of aggression against Iraq, that presumably put him on the side of the terrorists and therefore made him the proper target of a secret and surreptitious spy operation.)
Did Blair deny the charge? No, he’s just angry and outraged over the lack of patriotism shown by someone who would have the audacity to reveal such nefarious Top Secret misconduct. “National security,” you know.
I wonder if Blair would have sided with U.S. President ...
Saturday, January 31, 2004
Given the fact that thousands of innocent people, including more than 500 American soldiers, have been killed in the effort to “disarm Saddam” of weapons of mass destruction that he didn’t possess, in retrospect wouldn’t it have been a lot better if President Bush had accepted Saddam Hussein's offer to settle their personal differences with a duel?
Friday, January 30, 2004
Amidst increasing calls for an independent investigation by the mainstream press into the Bush administration’s use of Saddam Hussein’s nonexistent weapons of mass destruction to terrify the American people into supporting the invasion of Iraq, which we now know was being planned soon after Bush took office, the White House is now saying that the invasion was justified because Saddam had a history of attempting to acquire such weapons.
Well, ...
