The Future of Freedom Foundation
The Future of Freedom Foundation

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • About FFF
  • Explore Freedom
    • Daily Articles
    • Hornberger’s Blog
    • Multimedia
    • Freedom on the Web
    • Events
    • Future of Freedom Archive
    • Freedom Thinkers
    • Austrian Economics
  • Subscribe
  • Store
  • Donate
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About FFF
  • Explore Freedom
    • Daily Articles
    • Hornberger’s Blog
    • Multimedia
    • Freedom on the Web
    • Events
    • Future of Freedom Archive
    • Freedom Thinkers
    • Austrian Economics
  • Store
Explore Freedom » Daily Articles » Taxation

Taxation

by Jim Russell

December 1, 1994

EMAIL

Like many who consider themselves libertarians, I have concluded that taxation, in any form for any purpose, is theft. I agree with the nineteenth-century economist Frederic Bastiat, who called it legal plunder. It ought to be abolished.

When I state my position on this matter to others not versed in libertarianism, they invariably jump to the conclusion that I am an anarchist who would do away with government and the rule of law. Nothing could be further from the truth.

I am not against government — I believe that government is essential to protect us from violent and antisocial people and to provide a means by which people can resolve their disputes. I am simply against forcing anyone to pay for these important functions.

Like many other important things in life that can only be obtained from other people, or in cooperation with others, government — that is, good government — can be “purchased.” It can readily be obtained without force, just as food, shelter, and clothing are procured without robbing our neighbors. Just because I do not rob others to get food does not mean that I am against eating.

If government was financed by voluntary subscription instead of taxation, people would have as much government as they were willing to pay for. Then — and only then — could it truly be said that people got the government they deserved.

Moreover, there is little doubt that most people would voluntarily pay to have government ensure a peaceful and safe society. Why? Because most people consider this important. People do not need to be coerced into supporting churches, because they consider religion important. There is every reason to believe that the same would be true with respect to government.

Would there be people who reaped the benefits of voluntary government but refused to pay their fair share? Yes — just as there are people who receive the benefits of churches without paying for them. If enough people consider government to be important, the money to support government will be there. We need not concern ourselves with those who will choose to put their money elsewhere.

There are many reasons to overcome our dependence on force to pay for government, not the least of which is economics. The enforcement cost of taxation negates any advantages of this method of funding. Although it is difficult to accurately determine how much it costs to collect tax revenues, some economists have said that thirty percent of tax revenues collected in the United States today is spent to collect the revenues!

Many people who favor constitutional limits on taxation fear that abolition of taxation would jeopardize national security. But just wars (i.e., defensive ones) can be successfully waged without resort to taxation. Our war of independence proved that, conclusively. That eight-year conflict was prosecuted without taxation or conscription by the Continental Congress. It ended when an army of determined revolutionaries, voluntarily funded, defeated the most powerful government on earth. And it should be noted that when the Revolution ended, England was spending ninety-three percent of her tax revenues to pay for prior wars and existing military forces.

There is a nexus between war and taxes. There is a nexus between escalating violence in our society and the violence of taxation to finance the escalating cost of government. The common thread is force. The epitome of illiberal hypocrisy is to denominate oneself a peacemaker without opposing taxation. It does not matter whether the taxes are to pay for guns or butter, taxes amount to the initiation of force in human affairs, which results in all sorts of violent reactions.

Taxation can be defended on neither moral nor pragmatic grounds. Constitutionally limited government, voluntarily funded, will ultimately result in the most moral, peaceful, and free society in history.

Categories: Freedom Daily Archive, Taxation
EMAIL

This post was written by: Jim Russell

Mr. Russell, a Freedom Daily subscriber, is a writer residing in Ohio.

Trending Articles

  • Everybody’s Guilty by John W. Whitehead

  • The Stultification of American Conscience by Jacob G. Hornberger

  • Why Do Democrats Hate Donald Trump So Much? by Laurence M. Vance

  • Libertarian Lessons from the Super Bowl by Laurence M. Vance

  • Supreme Court Tortures the Constitution Again by James Bovard

  • The Effectiveness of Medical Marijuana Is Not the Issue by Laurence M. Vance

  • The Enclosure Acts and the Industrial Revolution by Wendy McElroy

  • Gun Control in Britain Has Failed by Scott McPherson

  • Overturning Roe v. Wade Is a Win for Federalism – and the Constitution by Scott McPherson

  • The Centenary of Ludwig von Mises’s Critique of Socialism by Richard M. Ebeling

Find Freedom on FFF

Libertarianism Defined

Libertarianism is a political philosophy that holds that a person should be free to do whatever he or she wants in life, so long as their conduct is peaceful.

Read more →

Trending Posts & Articles

  • Coming Full Circle with a Renewed Cold War Racket by Jacob G. Hornberger

  • Everybody’s Guilty by John W. Whitehead

  • More on America’s Culture of Immigration Death by Jacob G. Hornberger

  • Seven Days in May by Jacob G. Hornberger

  • The Stultification of American Conscience by Jacob G. Hornberger

  • America’s Culture of Immigration Death by Jacob G. Hornberger

  • Why Do Democrats Hate Donald Trump So Much? by Laurence M. Vance

  • Libertarian Lessons from the Super Bowl by Laurence M. Vance

  • Lee Harvey Oswald, JFK, and the National Security State by Jacob G. Hornberger

  • The Enclosure Acts and the Industrial Revolution by Wendy McElroy

  • Mission
  • Hornberger’s Blog
  • Events
  • FFF Articles
  • Journal Archive
  • Freedom on the Web
  • Freedom Thinkers
  • Austrian Economics
  • Store
The Future of Freedom Foundation
11350 Random Hills Road
Suite 800
Fairfax, VA 22030
Phone: (703) 934-6101

Email: fff@fff.org
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
© 1990 –   The Future of Freedom Foundation.
All rights reserved.