|
Send to a friend
Crime Creation
by Richard Ol Rowland, August 2000
THE HAWAII TAX on
cigarettes is the highest in the nation; $1 per package, $10 per carton.
Thats after the federal government applies its tax.
If you want to display your protest to
a mindless drivel of government laws and rules, one way to do it is to
smoke. So, cigarette smoking is appealing to teenagers, many of whom are
in search for ways to display rebellion and nonconformity. For some
reason, it is also appealing to persons in lower income brackets. Thus, we
have two vulnerable groups of citizens targeted for higher taxes, The fact
that such was not intended (perhaps) is not really relevant. The situation
exists, and it was sponsored by government action.
At a recent postlegislative session
briefing in Hawaii, state legislators addressed the cigarette-smoking
situation and reported with pride that the legislature had passed a new
law that requires a Hawaii cigarette tax stamp on each package sold. The
purpose of this action, they said, was to combat the developing black
market in illegally imported cigarettes. They mentioned something about
legal sales of cigarettes dropping dramatically as soon as the tax was
raised, which proved that illegal sales were occurring. Why it did not
prove that smoking was decreasing, I do not know. Anyway, concern was
expressed that sellers of illegal cigarettes might start targeting our
schoolchildren. The tax stamp would preclude that because there are very
heavy penalties (more law) for use or sale of cigarettes not bearing the
new tax stamp.
Lets review. Before this
war on cigarettes was launched with taxes raised sky-high
by government action, we had no significant black market and we certainly
were not concerned about spooky characters lurking around our schools
attempting to hook our kids on cigarettes. Now we have
these concerns. A whole new category of criminals has been created. A
new crime has been invented. Worse yet, when I looked up the report on the
law, it said in part, Provides for fines and proceeds from the sale
of forfeited cigarettes to be equally distributed between the county police
department or county liquor commission which investigated the case and
either the attorney general or prosecuting attorney which instituted the
action.
We already have far too many homes
and businesses burglarized, cars stolen, innocent persons assaulted, and
other significant crimes to which the police have not been devoting enough
time and attention. Now we have a brand new cigarette crime which police
and prosecutors will earn a profit for enforcing. Must I point out that they
do not profit from preventing your house from being broken into? Where do
you think police and court priorities are being directed? Well, let me give
you a clue: not to protect you and yours, thats for sure.
Soon, very soon, you will hear cries
for more police and more prosecutors because they are so busy enforcing
this new law. Then your taxes will be raised to hire more people to profit
from cigarette enforcement while you attempt to deal with your
neighborhood crime yourself disarmed, of course.
Most of us are in favor of crime
prevention. However, Im not convinced we should endorse crime
creation. If our legislators believe it is their function to create crime and
criminals under the guise of protecting society, it seems to
me that we should set them straight like straight out of office.
We have quite enough crime, thanks. The criminals do not deserve
government assistance for their business; its lucrative enough
already.
This whole mess reminds me that we
didnt have significant drug-abuse problems linked to major crime
organizations before the government declared a war on
drugs. Today, our society is being eaten from within by
government-created crime related to drugs. Cigarettes are now to be added.
Whats next? Coffee? Darn that
Starbucks subverting and corrupting our innocent youth.
Lets pass a law. We can tax everyone to death to preserve their
health ... with special emphasis on the poor and otherwise vulnerable. And
we can arrange to have the police profit from enforcement, thus further
corrupting them.
All this reflects a
progressive society, say our lawgivers. Their idea of
progress doesnt match mine. How about yours?
Mr. Rowland is in the insurance business in Hawaii.
Send to a friend
back to top
Subscribe to Freedom Daily.
|