|
Send to a friend
Printer Friendly PDF Format
Subscribe to FFF Email Update
Subscribe to Freedom Daily
A Whopper of an Inaugural Address
by
Sheldon Richman,
January 31, 2005
We have come to understand that when the typical
politician speaks, he ought not to be believed.
Nevertheless, in his inaugural address last week
President Bush achieved depths of incredibility
deserving of a place in the Guinness Book of
World Records.
Leave aside that his speech was preceded by his
sworn promise to preserve, protect and
defend the Constitution. We already know
what he thinks of that oath.
Four sentences into his speech Bush told an
amazing whopper. For a half century,
America defended our own freedom by standing
watch on distant borders. After the shipwreck of
communism came years of relative quiet, years of
repose, years of sabbatical and then
there came a day of fire. One has to
wonder what country he is talking about. Does he
seriously believe that after World War II the
U.S. government was a spectator to world events?
Or by distant borders does he mean
borders distant from the United States? That
would be closer to the truth.
In fact, since World War II U.S. presidents have
meddled in every region of the world, overtly
and covertly, propping up any dictator, no
matter how savage, claiming to be anti-communist. Do the names Ferdinand Marcos
of the Philippines, Shah Reza Pahlavi of Iran,
General Rafael Molino Trujillo of the Dominican
Republic, Saddam Hussein of Iraq, just to name a
few, ring a bell? All were put into power or
supported by U.S. administrations. All brought
untold misery to the people under their boot
heels. The idea that the United States stood on
the sidelines during the Cold War and after is
laughable, but I guess that is all ancient
history. Bush might believe it. But can his
speechwriters possibly think its true?
As the Washington Post pointed out
recently, the governments penchant for
allying with unsavory regimes continues to this
day, even as the president proclaims his global
crusade for what he calls freedom. The
Post reporters pointed out,
Some of the administrations allies
in the war against terrorism including
Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Uzbekistan
are ranked by the State Department as
among the worst human rights abusers. The
president has proudly proclaimed his friendship
with Russian President Vladimir Putin while
remaining largely silent about Putins
dismantling of democratic institutions in the
past four years. The administration, eager to
enlist China as an ally in the effort to
restrain North Koreas nuclear ambitions,
has played down human rights concerns there, as
well.
The Post has also noted that a
Human Rights Watch report charges that torture
and other mistreatment of prisoners occur
routinely in Iraq. According to the report,
interim Prime Minister Ayad Allawis regime
appears to be actively taking part, or is
at least complicit, in these grave violations of
fundamental human rights. This is the
model regime of which the Bush administration
boasts so proudly.
Another clue to whats going on is Libya.
The administration touts Col. Muammar
Qaddafis decision to give up his quest for
weapons of mass destruction. But notice there is
no talk of changing that dictatorial regime.
If you believe that the U.S. government has been
a passive bystander since 1945, I guess you
would think the attacks on 9/11 came out of the
blue. But people whove been paying
attention know how bogus that claim is. American
presidents and their military and espionage
forces have been key players in the Middle East
for many decades. The criteria they used for
picking sides had nothing to do with democracy.
As a result, tyrants were long on the U.S.
payroll and the Palestinians legitimate
grievances were ignored. The 9/11 attacks were
monstrously criminal, but they were not
unexpected.
The centerpiece of Bushs speech was this:
The survival of liberty in our land
increasingly depends on the success of liberty
in other lands. With that masterful
rhetorical stroke, he pulled an Orwell and
changed history, specifically, the rationale for
the invasion of Iraq.
Few Americans will notice that the provocative
crusade will make us less safe, not more. And,
oh yes, it will violate the presidents
oath to preserve the Constitution.
Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation, author of Tethered Citizens: Time to Repeal the Welfare State, and editor of The Freeman magazine. Send him email.
|