Given that so many conservatives have
come out in favor of George W. Bush, who supposedly
isnt as bad as John Kerry, an important question arises: Exactly how conservative is George W. Bush?
Bush has expanded the welfare state and increased
discretionary spending at a faster rate than any
president since Lyndon Johnson. His Medicare bill alone
should have disgusted enough conservatives sufficiently
to refuse to vote for him. The fact that the Bush
administration deliberately misled fellow Republicans in
Congress about the cost of the bill a misdeed that
would have surely, and justifiably, yielded scorn and
wrath from conservatives had Clinton been the perpetrator
should alone convince Americans that this
administration is neither politically honest nor fiscally
responsible.
Bushs trade policies have been quite protectionist
by modern standards. Moreover, farm subsidies under Bush have made
Clinton look like a Scrooge with tax dollars.
Bush signed the horrid McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance
Reform Bill, admitting that some of the provisions were
unconstitutional. Now he complains that the law
doesnt go far enough in restricting the political
speech of independent political organizations.
Though the assault-weapons ban has expired, it is no
credit to the administration. Bush expressed willingness
to revive the ban whereas he has shown nothing but
contempt in his stonewalling of efforts to arm airline
pilots.
And now hes calling for free government health
clinics in every town, free health care for all
disadvantaged youth, and massive welfare to Americans to
help them purchase homes.
Of course, this doesnt even get into Bushs
war policies, both at home and abroad, that many
conservatives have had the good sense to question. But
even if we assume Bush to be an angel as far as the war
on terror is concerned even if we assume his role
as a strong war president compensates for all the
socialism he has pushed through we see just how
much big government and spending some Republicans are
ultimately willing to tolerate: any amount. No matter how
much Bush increases spending, panders to voters, assaults
the free market as long as theres a war on,
and as long as a Republican is in charge, we must open
the floodgates to infinite government spending.
Indeed, to criticize even the domestic policies of Bush
is often interpreted as an endorsement of Kerry, and
hence an insult to America. To point out Bushs
flaws is to aid the Enemy.
The fact that the majority of people in a recent
worldwide poll said they prefer Kerry was taken by many
media conservatives to mean that the world hates America.
This ludicrous faux patriotism, whereby love of country
is the same as loyalty to a particular political party,
is not only un-American and dangerous, it explains to a
great extent why so many conservatives are willing to
relinquish any principles they might have regarding small
government in order to support whatever the president does.
Would conservatives feel the same way if Al Gore had
become president? If Gore, who unlike most Democrats voted in favor of Gulf War I, had gone
to war with both Afghanistan and Iraq, would his war
leadership automatically exempt him from criticism for
his domestic welfare spending, the way it appears to have
done in the case of Bush? If Kerry wins, will
conservatives be silent about the new presidents
welfare spending, as long as he wages a good war every
two years?
If Kerry seems dangerously socialistic, Bushs
competitive efforts to outspend the Democrats have been
no help. But it is hard to see how Kerry could possibly
be a bigger welfare-monger than Bush. Bushs record
makes all the combined social spending under the last two
Democratic presidents look paltry by comparison. Under a
Republican we have seen more socialism than a modern
Democrat could get away with, and we will continue to see
it so long as conservatives continue to support policies that violate conservative principles.
Anthony Gregory is a writer and musician who lives in Berkeley, California. He earned his bachelor’s degree in history at UC Berkeley, where he was president of the Cal Libertarians. He is an intern at the Independent Institute and has written for RationalReview.com, the Libertarian Enterprise, and
LewRockwell.com. See his webpage, AnthonyGregory.com, for more articles and personal information. Send him
email.
|
Send to a friend
Printer Friendly PDF Format
Subscribe to FFF Email Update
Subscribe to Freedom Daily
|
|
|
|