Sometimes the perverse consequences of federal government
policies and programs are evident immediately and
sometimes they take a bit longer. For example, at the end
of World War I, statists, imperialists, and
interventionists were in ecstasy over the U.S.
intervention, proudly claiming that the loss of more than
100,000 American deaths was worth the conquest of Germany
because the intervention had made the world safe for
democracy and finally, once and for all, put an end to
all European wars.
Sixteen years later, Adolf Hitler came to power,
capitalizing in large part on what had been done to
Germany in World War I, including the vengeful Treaty of
Versailles that was imposed on Germany by the United
States and its allies. Less than seven years later, World
War II began. I wonder if the pro-World War I crowd still thought that more than 100,000 American deaths in that war were worth it in 1940 or 1945.
After 9/11, President Bush, amidst tremendous fanfare,
declared his war on terrorism. Rather than
simply going after those individuals who had conspired to
commit the 9/11 attacks, he invaded both Afghanistan and
Iraq, on the basis of the notion that the president has
the power to preemptively attack, without the
constitutionally required congressional declaration of
war, any nation whose rulers might have harbored terrorists or
who might pose a terrorist threat to the United States at
some time in the future. In the process, the United
States killed tens of thousands of
innocent people
(that is, people who had nothing to do with 9/11 or even
the 1993 terrorist attack on the WTC), thereby producing
even more anger and hatred that will inevitably lead to
more terrorist attacks and ensuring that the process will
continue. This policy also ensures ever-increasing budgets
for the Department of Defense
(so-called) and ever-increasing federal power over
the lives and fortunes of the American people.
In the aftermath of the recent terrorist attack on a
school in Russia, which killed hundreds of innocent
people, mostly children, Russian officials are now
announcing that they are adopting and embracing
Bushs policies and programs for Russia itself.
According to CNN, Col.-Gen.
Yuri Baluyevsky, chief of the general staff of
Russias armed forces said, As for carrying
out preventive strikes against terrorist bases ... we
will take all measures to liquidate terrorist bases in
any region of the world.
What are the supporters of the Bush doctrine going to say
now that only the United States and no
other nation has the legitimate power to fight a
war on terrorism by attacking sovereign and independent
countries? No nation that has just lost hundreds of
children in a terrorist attack is going to accept that!
So there you have it the U.S. government and the
Russian government are both claiming the right to invade
independent and sovereign nations and wage wars of
aggression against them as part of their respective
wars on terrorism.
Ask yourself: What could be better from the standpoint of
the military-industrial complex, which President
Eisenhower warned us about? When
Russia begins attacking nations, just as its predecessor
the Soviet Union did, the U.S. Department of Defense will
have a new official enemy Russia, or communism, or
the former Soviet Union, or an unsafe world, or whatever
else is necessary to keep NATO and the Department of
Defense in high cotton for the foreseeable future. What a
surprise!
Meanwhile, given the presidents unconstitutional
assumption of power
to declare war; the doctrine of
waging wars of aggression contrary to the principles set
forth at Nuremberg; the brutal, indefinite military
occupation of foreign countries; the indefinite detention
of citizens and foreigners alike; FBI monitoring of
citizens; the rape, sex abuse, torture, and murder of
prisoners and "ghost detainees" and the resulting whitewashes and cover-ups; and the
calls to effectively build a Berlin Wall and station
troops along the U.S.
southern border, no one can reasonably
deny that the
United States is increasingly moving in the direction of
Russia or, even more accurately, the Soviet Union.
That is why it is so important to continue striving to
turn America in a new and better direction one
that rejects the principles of empire and interventionism
of the Soviet Union and instead embraces the principles
of republic
and nonintervention of
Americas Founding Fathers. If we fail to do that, an increasing array of perverse consequences arising from current U.S. foreign policy will inevitably besiege us.
Mr. Hornberger is founder and president of The
Future of Freedom Foundation. Send him email.
|
Send to a friend
Printer Friendly PDF Format
Subscribe to FFF Email Update
Subscribe to Freedom Daily
|
|
|
|