|
Send to a friend
Printer Friendly PDF Format
Subscribe to FFF Email Update
Subscribe to Freedom Daily
Reagans WMD Connection to
Saddam Hussein
by
Jacob G. Hornberger,
June 18, 2004
Given all the indignant neoconservative
outrage over the financial misdeeds arising
from the UNs socialist oil-for-food program during
the 1990s, when the UN embargo was killing untold numbers
of Iraqi children, one would think that there would be an
equal amount of outrage over a much more disgraceful
scandal the U.S. delivery of weapons of mass
destruction to Saddam Hussein during the Reagan
administration in the 1980s.
After all, as everyone knows, it was those WMDs that U.S.
officials, from President Bush and Vice-President Cheney
on down, ultimately used to terrify the American people
into supporting the invasion and war of aggression
against Iraq, a war that has killed or maimed thousands
of innocent people that is, people who had
absolutely nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks in New
York and Washington.
In an October 1, 2002, article entitled Iraq Got
Germs for Weapons Program from U.S. in 80s, Associated Press writer Matt Kelly wrote,
[The] Iraqi bioweapons program that President Bush wants
to eradicate got its start with help from Uncle Sam two
decades ago, according to government records that are
getting new scrutiny in light of the discussion of war
against Iraq.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sent
samples directly to several Iraqi sites that U.N. weapons
inspectors determined were part of Saddam Husseins
biological weapons program, CDC and congressional records
from the early 1990s show. Iraq had ordered the samples,
saying it needed them for legitimate medical research.
The CDC and a biological-sample company, the American
Type Culture Collection, sent strains of all the germs
Iraq used to make weapons, including anthrax, the
bacteria that make botulinum toxin, and the germs that
cause gas gangrene, the records show. Iraq also got
samples of other deadly pathogens, including West Nile
virus.
The transfers came in the 1980s, when the United States
backed Iraq in its war against Iran.
In a December 17, 2002, article entitled Iraq Used
Many Suppliers for Nuke Program, the Associated
Press stated,
Dozens of suppliers, most in Europe, the United States
and Japan, provided the components and know-how Saddam
Hussein needed to build an atomic bomb, according to
Iraqs 1996 accounting of its nuclear program....
Iraqs report says the equipment was either sold or
made by more than 30 German companies, 10 American
companies, 11 British companies and a handful of Swiss,
Japanese, Italian, French, Swedish and Brazilian firms.
It says more than 30 countries supplied its nuclear
program.
It details nuclear efforts from the early 1980s to the
Gulf War and contains diagrams, plans and test results in
uranium enrichment, detonation, implosion testing and
warhead construction....
Most of the sales were legal and often made with the
knowledge of governments. In 198590, the U.S.
Commerce Department, for example, licensed $1.5 billion
in sales to Iraq of American technology with potential
military uses. Iraq was then getting Western support for
its war against Iran, which at the time was regarded as
the main threat to stability in the oil-rich Gulf region.
In a September 26, 2002, article entitled Following Iraq's Bioweapons Trail, columnist Robert Novak
wrote,
An eight-year-old Senate report confirms that
disease-producing and poisonous materials were exported, under
U.S. government license, to Iraq from 1985 to 1988 during
the Iran-Iraq war. Furthermore, the report adds, the
American-exported materials were identical to
microorganisms destroyed by United Nations inspectors
after the Gulf War. The shipments were approved despite
allegations that Saddam used biological weapons against
Kurdish rebels and (according to the current official
U.S. position) initiated war with Iran.
In a September 18, 2002, ABC article entitled A Tortured Relationship, reporter Chris Bury
wrote,
Indeed, even as President Bush castigates Saddams
regime as a grave and gathering danger,
its important to remember that the United States
helped arm Iraq with the very weapons that administration
officials are now citing as justification for
Saddams forcible removal from power.
In a March 16, 2003, article entitled How Iraq Built Its Weapons Program, in the St. Petersburg
Times, staff writer Tom Drury wrote,
Yet here we are, on the eve of what could turn into a
$100-billion war to disarm and dismantle the Iraqi
dictatorship. U.N. inspectors are working against the
clock to figure out if Iraq retains chemical and
biological weapons, the systems to deliver them, and the
capacity to manufacture them.
And heres the strange part, easily forgotten in the
barrage of recent rhetoric: It was Western governments
and businesses that helped build that capacity in the
first place. From anthrax to high-speed computers to
artillery ammunition cases, the militarily useful
products of a long list of Western democracies flowed
into Iraq in the decade before its 1990 invasion of
Kuwait.
Unfortunately, the U.S.-WMD connection to Saddam Hussein
involved more than just delivering those WMDs to him. In
an August 18, 2002, New York Times article
entitled Officers Say U.S. Aided Iraq in War Despite Use of Gas, Patrick E. Tyler wrote,
A covert American program during the Reagan
administration provided Iraq with critical battle
planning assistance at a time when American intelligence
agencies knew that Iraqi commanders would employ chemical
weapons in waging the decisive battles of the Iran-Iraq
war, according to senior military officers with direct
knowledge of the program.
Those officers, most of whom agreed to speak on the
condition that they not be identified, spoke in response
to a reporters questions about the nature of gas
warfare on both sides of the conflict between Iran and
Iraq from 1981 to 1988. Iraqs use of gas in that
conflict is repeatedly cited by President Bush and, this
week, by his national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice,
as justification for regime change in Iraq.
As writer Norm Dixon put it in his June 17, 2004, article How Reagan Armed Saddam with Chemical Weapons,
While the August 18 NYT article added new details about the extent of US military collaboration with Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein during Iraq's 1980-88 war with Iran, it omitted the most outrageous aspect of the scandal: not only did Ronald Reagan's Washington turn a blind-eye to the Hussein regime's repeated use of chemical weapons against Iranian soldiers and Iraq's Kurdish minority, but the US helped Iraq develop its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs.
Immediately prior to the US invasion of Iraq, Saddam
Hussein delivered a WMD declarations report to the United
Nations in an attempt to avert a U.S. invasion. Do you
recall that U.S. officials intercepted the report and
removed special sections of it, based on claims of
national security? Well, it turned out that
the removed sections involved the delivery of those WMDs
by the United States and other Western countries to
Saddam Hussein, information that obviously caused U.S.
officials a bit of discomfort on the eve of their
invasion.
In a February 3, 2003, Sunday Morning Herald
article entitled, Reaping the Grim Harvest We Have
Sown, writer Anne Summers wrote,
What is known is that the 10 non-permanent members had to
be content with an edited, scaled-down version. According
to the German news agency DPA, instead of the 12,000
pages, these nations including Germany, which this
month became president of the Security Council
were given only 3,000 pages.
So what was missing?
The Guardian reported that the nine-page
table of contents included chapters on
procurements in Iraqs nuclear program
and relations with companies, representatives and
individuals for its chemical weapons program. This
information was not included in the edited version.
In a June 9, 2004, article Reagan Played a Decisive Role in Saddam Husseins Survival in Iran-Iraq War, Agence France Presse points out,
In February 1982, the State Department dropped Baghdad
from its list of state sponsors of terrorism, clearing
the way for aid and trade.
A month later, Reagan ordered a review of US policy in
the Middle East which resulted in a marked shift in favor
of Iraq over the next year.
Soon thereafter, Washington began passing
high-value military intelligence to Iraq to help it fight the
war, including information from US satellites that helped
fix key flaws in the fortifications protecting al-Basrah
that proved important in Irans defeat in the next
month, wrote Kenneth Pollack in his recently
published book The Threatening Storm. ...
By March 1985, the United States was issuing Baghdad
export permits for high tech equipment crucial for its
weapons of mass destruction programs, according to
Pollack.
In his June 8, 2004, article Reagan and Saddam: The Unholy Alliance, Alex Dawoody states,
By 1982, Iraq was removed from the list of terrorist
sponsoring nations. By 1984, America was actively sharing
military intelligence with Saddams army. This aid
included arming Iraq with potent weapons, providing
satellite imagery of Iranian troops deployments and
tactical planning for battles, assisting with air
strikes, and assessing damage after bombing campaigns.
One of the most fascinating parts of this entire sordid
U.S. foreign-policy episode is that none other than Donald Rumsfeld played a key role in it. Yes, the same
Donald Rumsfeld who, as U.S. Secretary of Defense, scared
the American people to death with the thought that Saddam
Hussein was about to employ the WMDs (which the U.S. had delivered to him) against them.
A December 31, 2002, CBS story entitled U.S. and Iraq Go Way Back, put it this way:
Newly released documents show that U.S. officials, including Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, played a leading role in building up Iraq's military in the 1980s when Iraq was using chemical weapons, a newspaper reports.
It was Rumsfeld, now defense secretary and then a special presidential envoy, whose December 1983 meeting with Saddam Hussein led to the normalization of ties between Washington and Baghdad, according to the Washington Post.
In an August 18, 2002, MSNBC article entitled
Rumsfeld Key Player in Iraq Policy Shift,
Robert Windrem wrote,
State Department cables and court records reveal a wealth
of information on how U.S. foreign policy shifted in the
1980s to help Iraq. Virtually all of the information is
in the words of key participants, including Donald
Rumsfeld, now secretary of defense.
The new information on the policy shift toward Iraq, and
Rumsfelds role in it, comes as The New York Times
reported Sunday that the United States gave Iraq vital
battle-planning help during its war with Iran as part of
a secret program under President Reagan even
though U.S. intelligence agencies knew the Iraqis would
unleash chemical weapons.
In a February 24, 2003, article entitled Who Armed Saddam? writer Stephen Green wrote,
And hed probably read the front page Washington
Post story (U.S. Had Key Role in Iraq
Buildup, 12/30/02) based upon recently declassified
documents, which revealed that it was Rumsfeld himself
who, as President Reagans Middle East Envoy, had
traveled to the Region to meet with Saddam Hussein in
December 1983 to normalize, particularly, security
relations.
In her article Reaping the Grim Harvest We Have
Sown, Anne Summers reinforced this point:
In December 1983, Rumsfeld, then a special envoy to the
Middle East appointed by President Reagan, travelled to
Baghdad to inform Saddam Hussein that the United States
was ready to resume full diplomatic relations with Iraq.
A lengthy report in the Washington Post on December 30,
2002 based on analysing thousands of pages of
declassified government documents and interviews with
former policy-makers said that US
intelligence and logistical support played a crucial role
in shoring up Iraqi defences following
Rumsfelds visit.
So, what is Rumsfelds response to all this?
Unfortunately, he suffers a malady that commonly afflicts
Washington officials when a whiff of scandal is in the
air: selective memory lapse. According to Matt
Kellys article (cited above),
The disclosures put the United States in the position of
possibly having provided key ingredients of the weapons
it is considering waging war to destroy, said Sen. Robert
C. Byrd (D., W.Va.), who entered the documents into the
Congressional Record last month.
Byrd asked Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld about the
germ transfers at a recent Senate Armed Services
Committee hearing. Byrd noted that Rumsfeld met Saddam
Hussein in 1983, when Rumsfeld was President Ronald
Reagans Middle East envoy.
Are we, in fact, now facing the possibility of
reaping what we have sown? Byrd asked Rumsfeld
after reading parts of a Newsweek article on the
transfers.
I have never heard anything like what youve
read, I have no knowledge of it whatsoever, and I doubt
it, Rumsfeld said. He later said he would ask the
Defense Department and other agencies to search their
records for evidence of the transfers.
Or as Robert Novak put it in his column (cited above),
Sen. Robert Byrd, a master at hectoring executive branch
witnesses, asked Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld a
provocative question last week: Did the United States
help Saddam Hussein produce weapons of biological
warfare? Rumsfeld brushed off the Senates
84-year-old president pro tem like a Pentagon reporter. But a
paper trail indicates Rumsfeld should have answered yes.
According to the article by Anne Summers (cited above),
These days Rumsfeld likes to downplay or even deny his
role in helping arm Iraq with the makings of weapons of
mass destruction. He has been quoted as saying he had
nothing to do with helping Iraq fight Iran in
the 80s. However, the Washington Post says, The
documents show that his visits to Baghdad led to closer
US-Iraqi cooperation on a wide variety of fronts.
Given that the WMDs that were used to justify the
invasion and war against Iraq never materialized, one
would think that the neoconservatives who pushed and
misled America into the war, and those members of
Congress who complacently rubber-stamped the
presidents actions, and those members of the press
who served as the administrations cheerleaders
would be at least mildly outraged over how Saddam Hussein
acquired his WMDs in the first place from the
United States and other countries during the Reagan
administration. Unfortunately, the response has been the
standard ho-hum one hears whenever the rot at the center of the empire surfaces: It was just a policy
mistake; it happened a long time ago; we need to put it
behind us; and its now time to move on.
It is that mindset of denial, however, that is certain to
doom our nation to increasing conflicts, crises, and
turmoil. To restore political, moral, and economic health to our country, it is necessary to excise the cancer associated with the unrestrained — and oftentimes secret — exercise of government power. In order to excise such a cancer, however, it is first necessary to acknowledge and confront its
existence.
Mr. Hornberger is founder and president of The
Future of Freedom Foundation. Send him email.
|