In a recent poll of cable-television viewers, only 20
percent said the general public has much say in what the
government does. Maybe people are finally catching on.
Its about time.
The poll by Peter D. Hart cant be pleasing to those
who make a holy shrine of the ballot box. Our key
finding was that people are really unhappy about their
role, or lack of it, in the democratic process,
Hart told the Washington Post.
Recent events could hardly be expected to build
confidence. It may be starting to dawn on people that
government has been largely inept at what they would
regard as its most important task: keeping them safe from
foreign attack. The revelations after 9/11 demonstrate
what some people have long known: government is like the
Wizard of Oz. Behind the imposing façade are a bunch
of clueless bureaucrats and politicians who are more
interested in extending their tenures in office than
anything else.
This is a bipartisan phenomenon. The current debate over
who was more incompetent, the Clintonites or the Bushies,
is just a distraction. When it comes to the fraud known
as national security, its strictly a
one-party system. (Its really not that much
different in domestic affairs.)
Bill Kristol, editor of neoconservative magazine
The Weekly Standard and a leading advocate
of replacing the old American republic with an empire,
gave the game away the other day. On Fox Newss
Special Report with Brit Hume, Kristol had
harsh words for former Clinton and Bush anti-terrorism
specialist Richard Clarke, whose new book indicts the
Bush administration for not taking al-Qaeda seriously
enough before 9/11. Kristol criticized Clarke for
breaking a tacit agreement between Democrats and
Republicans. What was the agreement? Not to score
political points by pointing out each others
failings in guarding the American people against
terrorism.
Close observers wouldnt have been surprised by
Kristols point. But I wonder what the average
American would think about this agreement. Perhaps
conspiracy is a more precise word for what
Kristol was talking about.
Several hundreds of billions of dollars are extracted
from the earnings of the American people every year,
ostensibly to keep them safe. But they were not kept
safe, beginning with the 1993 bombing of the World Trade
Center. Then they were lied to by Democrats and
Republicans. After 9/11 administration officials, such as
National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, said they
never dreamed anyone would hijack airplanes and crash
them into buildings. But we know there were intelligence
warnings about just this tactic before the attacks. Why
do they lie to us, except to save their own skins?
Then there are those phantom weapons of mass destruction.
Need anything more be said? Since U.S. forces took over
Iraq, the administration has been spreading money around
like melted butter. No scientist or other informed person
in that country could fail to realize that providing
evidence of such weapons would bring a small fortune.
Thats a sure sign that there is no evidence. It
also refutes any administration official, such as Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who insists that weapons might
still be found.
Given all this, why shouldnt people believe that
the government is something separate from them and out of
their control?
In the presidential season one might expect people to
feel that this is their chance to make a difference
until one looks at the choice facing
them. Who is set to oppose the incumbent who ignored
warnings about terrorism and then misled the American
people into war against a country that had nothing to do
with that terrorism? John Kerry, a senator who voted to
give President Bush a blank check to go to war (in
violation of the Constitution); who voted to give
Attorney John Ashcroft astoundingly un-American powers to
curtail civil liberties (including habeas corpus); and
who now says his votes dont mean what they clearly
do mean. Or as Groucho Marx said once, Who are you
going to believe, me or your eyes?
Two hundred and eighty-five million people cannot rule a
country. But a small clique can rule and say its on
behalf of the people. The last few years have been a
valuable civics lesson.
Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation, author of Tethered Citizens: Time to Repeal the Welfare State, and editor of The Freeman magazine. Send him email.
|
Send to a friend
Printer Friendly PDF Format
Subscribe to FFF Email Update
Subscribe to Freedom Daily
|
|
|
|