Following the inevitable victory of allied military power
over Iraqs decrepit army, White House officials
were hesitant to express too much jubilation, lest their
reaction be thought to lack seemly restraint. As
buildings burned and children died, apparently they saw
wisdom in a muted celebration. Administration
officials steered clear of gloating about the success of
their war plan is how the Washington
Times reported it on April 10. There were no
high-fives in the White House, said a senior
administration official. There are no gloaters in
this building.
Instead, all the gloating was being done half a world
away, at a press conference in Rome.
There, without any pretense toward humility, the U.S.
undersecretary of state for arms control, John Bolton,
outlined in more sincere detail the sentiments of the
president through ominous warning to the governments of
Iran, North Korea, and Syria, indicating what they can
expect if they continue to pursue nuclear, biological, or
chemical weapons programs in defiance of U.S. wishes.
We are hopeful that a number of regimes will draw
the appropriate lesson from Iraq that the pursuit of
weapons of mass destruction is not in their national
interest, he told a group of reporters. Coming on
the very day that American tanks were rolling down the
streets of Baghdad, no one missed the implication.
The next day, Secretary of State Colin Powell added his
own not-so-subtle hint to the din of threatening
rhetoric. We hope that as a result of whats
happened in Iraq ... some of the nations that we have
been in touch with and speaking to Syria and Iran
will move in a new direction, he said in a
Pakistani television interview. Not to be outdone, the
U.S. ambassador to the Dominican Republic, Hans Hertell,
took advantage of Americas latest military conquest
to flex a little muscle on his own Latin American turf.
I think what is happening in Iraq ... is a very good
example for Cuba, he told Agence France-Presse.
Reveling in military glory and domination, those running
our government are sending a calculated message to the
world about the powers being assumed by its latest ruling
empire. Simply translated: If you behave in a way
that offends us, you too will be bombed into submission
and your government replaced with one more amenable to
our foreign-policy designs.
Writing in his nationally syndicated column, David
Limbaugh joined the cheerleading squad for global war by
smugly describing President Bush as a man who means
what he says, since the United States has
decimated the Iraqi forces in such astonishingly short
order. Well, if there was ever any doubt of that
before, there certainly isnt now. Still, Limbaugh
should wipe that war-happy smile from his face: After
all, history is replete with bullies who meant what they
said and backed it up with military might and it
does not treat them kindly.
Worse, the reckless statements of people like John
Bolton, Colin Powell, and Ambassador Hertell
obviously made at the behest of the president make
it painfully clear that broader plans are in the works.
Riding on a euphoric wave of seeming invincibility, the
U.S. government is announcing to a shocked and awestruck
world that it will do precisely what it likes, when it
likes, and to whom it likes, and for those who object,
well, witness what we did to Iraq.
Though it isnt what our public officials intended,
there is definitely something to be learned from all of
this hawkish revelry: with each new military victory
comes more arrogance and more power narcotics for
those who see a world out there literally waiting to be
conquered.
Scott McPherson is a policy advisor at The Future of Freedom Foundation.
|
Send to a friend
Printer Friendly PDF Format
Subscribe to FFF Email Update
Subscribe to Freedom Daily
|
|
|
|