A majority of the American population believe that Iraq
was behind the terrorist acts of September 11, even
though no credible evidence has surfaced for this alleged
link between al-Qaeda and Iraq. In his speech to the
American Enterprise Institute, President Bush used this
link to justify invading Iraq as a necessary act of
self-defense.
There is indeed a link between the al-Qaeda terrorist
network and Iraq, but it is different from that put forth
by the administration. It was the Gulf War of 1991
against Iraq that spawned al-Qaeda. From the very
beginning, Osama bin Ladens continual refrain has
been that the foreign forces on Arab soil have
compromised Arab sovereignty and polluted Islams
holy lands. He was able to present al-Qaeda as a
legitimate response to Arab grievances and to portray the
allied forces as being akin to the Crusaders who came
from the West to wrest control of Jerusalem from Islam in
the Middle Ages. In addition, he used the pro-Israeli
bias in American foreign policy to win credibility with
the Arab street. Thus, it is not the acts of September 11
that link Iraq and al-Qaeda, but the U.S. decision to
prosecute the Gulf War and to consistently support
Israel.
The Gulf War was waged by the United States to eject
Iraqi forces from Kuwait. It had UN support, and the
forces that went in to fight the armies of Saddam Hussein
comprised a large coalition of nations, including Muslim
and Arab nations. Even then al-Qaeda was able to portray
it as a crusade against Islam, and give credibility to
Samuel Huntingtons theory about an inevitable clash
of civilizations.
The upcoming war is being opposed by more than 115
nations that belong to the Non-Aligned Movement, the
Organization of the Islamic Council, and the Arab League,
in addition to several key European nations. If the UN
Security Council refuses to support the war, its
prosecution by the United States will represent a breach
of the UN Charter, according to UN Secretary-General Kofi
Annan, stripping it of multilateral legitimacy.
U.S. efforts to build a broad coalition of countries to
invade Iraq have failed, and the war will be fought
largely with U.S. troops, with possible assistance from
Australia and Britain. Neither Arab armies nor any
third-world armies (Muslim or otherwise), are likely to be in
the coalition of the willing, belying the
allegation that Iraq poses a threat to its neighbors.
President Bush has expressed a hope that this war would
lead to a fair resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian
problem. However, as Shlomo Ben-Ami, a former foreign
minister of Israel, observed recently, The
presidents bellicose rhetoric and his intention to
invade an Arab country and dismantle its regime by force,
however despicable that regime may be, while pretending
to ignore the Palestinian tragedy, provides a platform
for unrest throughout the region.
According to published accounts, the United States will
fire more than 3,000 cruise missiles on Iraq within the
first 48 hours of the war. That exceeds the entire number
that were fired in the Gulf War and will lead to
large-scale Iraqi casualties. More casualties will occur as
U.S. forces fight their way into Baghdad and as Saddam
Hussein resorts to using civilians as human shields. This
war may result in an even higher number of casualties
than the Gulf War, which resulted in more than 200,000
Iraqi deaths.
The United States is making rapid strikes against
al-Qaeda. As a result of Pakistani cooperation, it has
apprehended or killed many of its key leaders and appears
to be rapidly closing in on the top two. With the capture
of the third-highest ranking man, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed,
the organization may have lost its operational capability
to mount spectacular acts of terrorism, its
telltale mark. However, all of this success will come to
naught if the United States invades Iraq.
It is likely that the war will add credibility to Osama
bin Ladens assertions about loss of Arab
sovereignty. The war will almost certainly complicate
attempts to find a fair resolution of the
Israeli-Palestinian problem, and it will further anti-Americanism
in the Arab and Muslim worlds. In a fulfillment of the
law of unintended consequences, it may spawn a
second-generation of terrorists even more determined than
al-Qaeda to evict U.S. forces from the Middle East, thus
defeating the very purposes for which it is about to be
fought.
America would be the safer without fighting this war.
Ahmad Faruqui writes frequently on the Middle East and is
the author of Rethinking the National Security of
Pakistan.
|
Send to a friend
Printer Friendly PDF Format
Subscribe to FFF Email Update
Subscribe to Freedom Daily
|
|
|
|