(BONUS! Hatemail from op-ed editors in response to this article.)
The American put-downs of the French over their
unwillingness to sign up for the Coalition of the Willing
are a little too glib for my tastes. Theres the
story of the American who asked the French citizen if he
speaks German. When told no, the American says,
Youre welcome. Then theres the
one about the American who asks if the French citizen
wants all Americans out of his country including
the dead ones.
These are cheap debating points. They clarify nothing.
They are home-crowd-pleasers and that is all.
To see this, we can come up with counter-anecdotes: The
Frenchman asks the American if he speaks with a British
accent, and when told no, he replies, Youre
welcome. Or the Frenchman might tell the American
that the Germans couldnt have conquered France in
1940 had the United States not entered World War I in
1917, because the Nazis would never have come to power
had that war ended with a negotiated settlement, which
U.S. entry foreclosed.
Another point that eludes the American side is that
gratitude is no reason to follow someone off to war.
Liberating France from the Nazis was a nice thing to do,
but it is not nice to demand slavish support for U.S.
foreign policy in return. Going to war is a serious
matter. One should have a better reason for doing it than
repaying an old debt. The congressional chatter about
punishing France by restricting its wine and water
exports is an exercise in pettiness, not to mention a
violation of the rights of Americans.
It is regularly suggested that Frances abstention
from the Coalition of the Willing (who comes up with
these idiotic names?) has much to do with its Iraqi oil
contracts. It probably does, but this criticism slices
two ways. If the French government can let oil and money
set its foreign-policy agenda, why not the U.S.
government? American exceptionalism sometimes goes to
ridiculous extremes. No one in this country has a
scintilla of trouble imagining that the French are
motivated by a wish to protect their access to oil. But
suggest that the U.S. government might have something
similar in mind and you could be accused of uttering
fighting words. America wouldnt do
that! Well, why not? Are American politicians
uniquely virtuous and incapable of acting on a base
motive? Thats a touching piece of faith, but
lets see some evidence.
The U.S. war record runs in
the other direction. If American foreign-policy makers
differ from their European counterparts it is in their
ability to delude themselves into believing that they are
pursuing a selfless cause. Certain American companies
stand to gain multimillion-dollar contracts when control
of Iraqi oil changes hands and the infrastructure
needs rebuilding after the coming war. Many of those
companies have ties to the Bush administration. It is not
cynicism just realism that connects those
dots. Scoffing at the idea that oil is part of the
presidents war equation is not the same as refuting
it.
The criticism of French President Jacques Chirac and
German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder is plagued by another
difficulty. The French and German people overwhelmingly
oppose the war. Those countries are democracies. Does the
pro-war chorus expect Chirac and Schroeder to defy their
peoples wishes? Apparently democracy is only for
Iraq.
Usually, Americans have no reason to defer to the French
or the other Europeans. Most countries in Europe have
sunk further into the sludge of socialism than America
has, and their economic conditions show it. Their respect
for civil liberties, such as freedom of speech and press,
is weak. Their enthusiasm for such things as the bogus
Kyoto global warming treaty is groundless.
Their ability to make themselves think that they care
less about money than the Americans do is about equal to
the Americans ability to make themselves think that
war is a humanitarian gesture.
That being said, on the subject of war in Iraq, the
French and Germans have got it right regardless of
their motives.
Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation in Fairfax, Va., and
editor of Ideas on Liberty magazine.
The following emails were received from U.S. op-ed editors in response to Sheldon Richman's op-ed "The French Got It Right This Time":
###########
YOU ARE AN IDIOT and it is apparent your LIBERAL MIND has totally overloaded any common sense you may have ever possessed...Please DO NOT forward any more of your trash toward my e-mail address, it is one thing to be assumed stupid totally another matter to put stupidity into words so anyone reading knows beyond a shadow of doubt you are... How many more World Towers, Oklahoma government buildings, foreign diplomats, HOW MANY MORE is enough???
###########
French paying you off, rite?
###########
Pleeeeeese shut up with your anti american viewpoint....right makes might not the other way around. do you actually believe your own idiotic vitriol? if you don't like America you can always leave......this is not from the management of this station but from an employee. We will win the war for you people just like we always do and just like always you and your ilk will hate us for it.
###########
Sounds to me like Mr. Richman needs to wake up!!!
###########
Please quit sending your press releases to us. We get enough junk as it
is.
###########
Screw the french.
|
Send to a friend
Printer Friendly PDF Format
Subscribe to FFF Email Update
Subscribe to Freedom Daily
|
|
|
|