|
Send to a friend
Does Endorsement of Military Tribunals Insult Bush?
by
Jacob G. Hornberger,
January 2002
As FFF friends and supporters know, we have taken a firm stand against
President Bush's military tribunals. See, for example, "Military Tribunals: Another Step Away from Our Principles" by Jacob G. Hornberger
and "Emergencies, Military Tribunals,
and the Constitution" by Jacob G. Hornberger. In a recent conversation I had with
Sheldon Richman, he raised an interesting question: Why are the president's
supporters not instead calling for the summary execution of terrorists and
totally dispensing with the idea of military tribunals? The process that the
president has set up (without the approval of Congress) is that he makes the
initial determination as to whether a person is a terrorist, and then that
determination triggers a trial before a military tribunal. But as everyone
knows, the president is a good, honest, and conscientious man. Before
determining whether a person is a terrorist, he will closely examine all the
evidence and will arrive at a good-faith conclusion as to whether the person
is a terrorist or not. Why would the president's supporters want a military
tribunal second-guessing his determination? Don't they trust the president
to make the right decision? Surely they wouldn't suggest that President Bush
would falsely accuse an innocent person of terrorism, would they? What
happens if there's a "runaway" military tribunal -- one that decides that
the president has wrongfully accused an innocent person of terrorism?
Wouldn't that humiliate, demean, and insult the president in the eyes of the
world? Why would the president's supporters want to put him in that
position? Who do they trust to make the better and wiser decision -- our
democratically elected president or a military tribunal composed of
soldiers? If they trust their president more than military officials, then
why are they calling for military tribunals instead of summary execution of
people that our president has determined to be terrorists? For our part here
at FFF, we'll continue
calling for the executive branch, including the president, to do the
accusing and prosecuting, and the judicial branch, including juries, to do
the judging. just as our Founders envisioned when they brought the federal
government into existence with the Constitution.
|